Atheism’s Inability to Explain Evil

Atheism and the Problem of Evil—C. S. Lewis (1898 – 1963)

[ An offering from Kairos Journal ]

Many people are atheists because they believe that evil and suffering in the world proves that God does not exist. Looking back on his own intellectual and spiritual journey from atheism to Christian belief, however, C. S. Lewis argued quite the opposite. Whilst the suffering he experienced in his youth (the death of his mother, unhappy schooldays, and the traumas of service in the First World War) destroyed the simple faith of his childhood, he eventually came to realize that atheism is a superficial and inconsistent response to the problem of evil. For how, he argued, can anyone explain the presence within them of that very moral standard which alone enables them to complain about the existence of evil and use it as an argument against God? Where does this moral standard come from? Moreover, if there is no God and human beings are only accidental by-products of a random and purposeless universe, how can atheists attach any significance to their thoughts and values? These points were summarized most effectively for a popular audience in this extract from one of C. S. Lewis’s famous BBC radio broadcasts during World War II.

My argument against God was that the universe seemed so cruel and unjust. But how had I got this idea of just and unjust? A man does not call a line crooked unless he has some idea of a straight line. What was I comparing the universe with when I called it unjust? If the whole show was bad and senseless from A to Z, so to speak, why did I, who was supposed to be part of the show, find myself in such violent reaction against it? A man feels wet when he falls into water, because man is not a water animal: a fish would not feel wet. Of course, I could have given up my idea of justice by saying it was nothing but a private idea of my own. But if I did that, then my argument against God collapsed too – for the argument depended on saying that the world was really unjust, not simply that it did not happen to please my fancies. Thus in the very act of trying to prove that God did not exist – in other words, that the whole of reality was senseless – I found I was forced to assume that one part of reality – namely my idea of justice – was full of sense. Consequently, atheism turns out to be too simple. If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have found out that it has no meaning: just as, if there were no light in the universe and therefore no creatures with eyes, we should never know it was dark. Dark would be a word without meaning.1


1 C. S. Lewis, Mere Christianity (New York: HarperCollins, 2001), 38-39.

3 thoughts on “Atheism’s Inability to Explain Evil

  1. The host on the Closer to Truth series on PBS came up with 3 postulates to address evil in the world. First, evil existed because God did not exist. Two, God exists and is responsible for evil in the world. Three, God exists and allows evil to exist and occur in the world. One thing is for sure: the world we are currently residing in (and have a life sentence in) has plenty of evil in it, and plenty of injustice and suffering as well.


  2. I’m an atheist and I can explain evil – evil is turning your back on your persecuted neighbor. It’s failing to help out when you can. Those are just a couple that inform my sense of evil.


    1. I like what you say here truthspew and I agree, those things are evil. But where does your sense of those things being evil come from? Why, if we are just an evolved set of chemicals are some things wrong and others evil?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.